• apcointl.org
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Buyer’s Guide
  • PSC Magazine
  • Submit Press Release
  • Contact Us
Public Safety Communications
Show Menu

Virginia: Portsmouth Blames State for Overpayments to 9-1-1 Program

External News Source November 26, 2012 Industry

By Patrick Wilson, The Virginian-Pilot(Norfolk, Va.)

City officials are challenging a state agency’s assertion that the 9-1-1 center received more than $1 million too much because of a mistake on Portsmouth’s end.

In a letter to the Virginia E-9-1-1 Services Board, an assistant city attorney wrote that inaction by the state over several years was part of the problem.

The Virginia E-9-1-1 Services Board gives money to 9-1-1 centers based on certain criteria.

During a routine audit of fiscal 2010 money, the agency discovered a possible error with data provided by Portsmouth.

A full audit of all 9-1-1 centers in Virginia then showed funding was not distributed appropriately and that Portsmouth had received an extra $1.1 million over three years.

The state informed Portsmouth leaders that it wants the money repaid, hopefully by the end of the year.

But a Nov. 16 letter from Assistant City Attorney Nancy Cherry said Portsmouth informed the E-9-1-1 Services Board about overpayments in 2010 and the state took no action. She also wrote that the state can ask for a refund only during a current fiscal year.

“The Board is legally and equitably barred from seeking retroactive payments from Portsmouth,” she wrote.

The letter also outlined why Portsmouth officials believe that the city’s police communications manager noticed and reported to the state – several times – a large increase in payments.

“We’ve been trying to fix this since 2010,” Police Chief Ed Hargis said.

The city attorney’s office proposed a settlement: that the E-9-1-1 Services Board withhold Portsmouth’s monthly payments from December until June.

Steve Marzolf, the integrated services program director for the Virginia Information Technologies Agency, said this week that he couldn’t comment because the agency had not yet received the letter.

Copyright © 2012 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved. 

Share Facebook 0 Twitter 0 Google+ 0 LinkedIn 0
Previous article Maine: State Chooses Fairpoint a 3rd Time for 9-1-1 Upgrade Days after Contract Thrown Out
Next article Washington: County's 9-1-1 System & Backups Fail

Follow @apcointl

Follow @APCOIntl
Back to top

Current Issue

PSC Magazine

  • About PSC Magazine
  • Advertise
  • Buyer’s Guide
  • Subscribe
  • Submit an Article
  • Contact the Editor
  • Privacy Policy

Inside APCO

  • About APCO
  • Membership
  • Events
  • Training
  • Technology
  • Advocacy
  • Services
  • Contact APCO

Follow Us

Copyright 2025 APCO International

Close Window

Loading, Please Wait!

This may take a second or two. Loading, Please Wait!